BORROW
copyrighted work
SFGTV
September 23, 2010 10:00am-10:30am PST on SFGTV

0 comments
Clips viewed 29 times

Broadcast Summary

00:00
important enforcement prioritize bicyclists unfortunate pedestrians cbc far fair city type share safer number issues really streets somewhat required education motorists regarding
00:30
thank treat really safety important chairperson sit mar city much thanks issues police health bicycle advisory vehicles community committee different bicyclist blacklists department differently enforcement
01:00
thank committee necessary tremendous introduction representative lot job put city jury burt guys king point grand serve great susan really couple points bicycle richard thought livable advisory district
01:30
fits size enforcement footnote committee regarding 81 one bac itis laws point three issue fully agree report bicycle biggest traffic members applied advisory findings
02:00
kinds empty stop madras rolling behavior intersection sign recognize cyclists given citation cyclist difference road people direction clear targeted
02:30
targeted continue intersection frequently enforcement particularly slap seek slow full stop pose fact often kinds order danger things around entire bicycle complete motorist behavior motorists continuing
03:00
stop road advocating bicyclist recognizes differently law full cars ride side sign share slows stops allow behind change entire process slowdown sensible complete possible whenever solution everybody
03:30
never capacity sidewalk important concluding courteously red run law sign four size fits stop line turn road guess every light times people middle behind riding rolled safely address enforce cyclists unfairly
04:00
mar rolling thank dangerous bicycle chairperson district sign essentially echo supervisors advisory stop commissioner chu morning point behavior maxwell really
04:30
forward plan bike moving colleagues supervisors pd sf mta fact roads board really interim cycling working looking sharing director mentioned education coalition increasing
05:00
friendly livable beautiful francisco pedestrian chairperson san mar lot move bike hope else user bill road plan thank speak really anyone public making forward
05:30
finding recommendation discussed colleagues closed let response enough discussion discuss best comment public quickly move
06:00
jury grand response departments understand recommendations chu mta bike plan view often point civil speak answer report general getting amending findings provided questions diligence responded supervisor department
06:30
plan bike years fund bicycle adopted option mean implications recommendations every path adopt sfmta five budget smith last amend
07:00
plan due put next bike together san bite long point years start state adapt within things funded process another affairs project context scheduled francisco
07:30
plan review expensive environmental planned begin developments last recommendations incorporated bike lot fit locations took numbers adapting every improvements process survey
08:00
bike went three schedule significant understanding chu lot cost done city plan point years plant spend lifted process develop complete changing involved analysis locations supervisor injunction definitely
08:30
review process ceqa delaying part planning along projects plan environmental comes meant change lot
09:00
review process answering next confident questions environmental plan forward kill finish bicycle feel implemented action additional plans need bike budget
09:30
adopt around findings enforcement possibility immediately law city able bike jury plan major civil grand rules areas topics moving wanted things report action outside forward traffic putting supervisor understand chu components educational recommended
10:00
bike plan potentially enforcement supervisors recommendations mta able many view staff seems reach along exists stated member brought factors outside details covered earlier believe actually education absolutely additional
10:30
portion success education engineering created particularly process office responsibility monitoring safety measure basis traffic enforcement call threes
11:00
portion enforcement accidents considering cooperating participating bike years rates taken plant track number living working traffic success document measured accident together education
11:30
supervisor statistics successful violations participate enforcement try chu rate bike plan basis terms amend fully daily measure regards traffic keeping officers extensive practical
12:00
tracking fines citations issued generally collisions specific seen problematic fault recover many tell records able resulted fine
12:30
speed trying providing terms saturday technology able traffic everything left last company 2006 mta keeping material part
13:00
chu complete citations supervisor collisions retract statistics ok incidents unless questions right present committee data track
13:30
often findings mentioned defending enforcement chairperson mar lax size help view fits king point lacks susan raised safety public couple comment curious improve feeling advisory approach response something committee
14:00
view point lax perception educated pedestrian sure heavy participate someplace officer handed somewhere comment medium bicycles important often middle
14:30
four together different standing something education happened perspectives since advocate corners accident cooperate better helps
15:00
registration citations wondering curiosity supervisor perceptions chu lot bit bike help jury town bikes grand talked people office little report looked process onerous weekends question contacted something bicycling
15:30
jury respond register licensing supervisor chairperson jim chu mar ask civil staff grand issue folks maybe member policy wanted looked common quickly growing bicycles prepared remember
16:00
including licensing materials individual california jurisdictions 12 fee code area start state lasts davis found choose allows looked limited process provide program traffic license stickers berkeley programs
16:30
little bicycle impractical attach pay licenses stickers readable generation program years revenue bit attached three feet
17:00
california necessarily enforcement chairperson impractical registration 12 mr top chu mar law year find hill right three state saying within limits maximum operate confines something currently recommend expecting supervisor
17:30
city looked bicycle advisory committee tourist additional bikes community leave francisco volume given san greatest thousands world every davis
18:00
city registration bicyclist everything rigorously logistically burn else last bikes basis board forth sfmta asked system pretty burden stolen looked benefit establish difficult
18:30
licensing people discussed issue 12 confusion seems bicycles addressed california code vehicle respondents bring limited previous types state topic
19:00
bicycle sort party third useful another cost city shows cases cover aiding stolen hubbard program however internet somewhat services programs recovering registration administering
19:30
licensing department registries california recovering bicyclists age able fire sense state local lived level police search stolen bicycle parents worried national bicycles berkeley remember something encourage practical databases
20:00
bicycle bicycles cyclists lists question licensing license providing moved stopped bicyclists driver registering service actually people carry
20:30
city state people california impractical disincentive lot code live goes ride list major local power serve beyond change cycling license enforce require entering bicycles something districts
21:00
helpful prepared questions practical supervisor chairperson chu mar ones data major start board every sfmta comes awhile reasons provide findings district question concerns pursuing
21:30
value really appreciate important colleagues conversation tone title start safer brings moving report making streets finding sharing everyone roadways thinking conflict dialogue
22:00
board conflict mistrust approve motorists issues anger misperception response recommendation among together cyclists approved finding burke police
22:30
agreement campaigns dangerous department bicyclists suggestion san mta road raise clear agree proper police respond conduct reading sharing tensions response roadways adopting francisco education continues
23:00
plan mayor response motorists pedestrians recommendation bac 2011 jury hold among civil grand amend police submit should riders bicycle transit amended address hostile without january cyclists meetings adopting different objection attitudes
23:30
bike plan amending disagree recommend technical recommendation practical open may implications perhaps respond supervisor agree chu partially disagreement needs let hearing
24:00
without response objection supervisor thorough appreciated language chu coordination acceptable mar advisory issues committee anti entities chairperson mta bicycle
24:30
partial education responses disagreement systematic distribution key goal gets looks mayor sfmta number police create cyclists bicycles material response extensive motorists agreement materials
25:00
education reach targeted currently materials public committee aspect replaced sfpd exist provides mta bicycle agreement plan
25:30
perhaps however provided materials distribution incorporating chu mta sfpd buses three flyer agree groups funding finding believe request efforts response targeted specific available responses campaigns partially supervisor department information
26:00
bike different motorists bicyclists distribution transportation non hand terms modes groups number fairly robust school certain program members segments probably reaching outreach cyclists programs community
26:30
job incorporate information educational distributed systematically bac idea maybe agree things better couple groups others equally talking message getting leaflet adequate response pamphlet education motorists campaigns partially materials understand
27:00
else buses something categories educational chairperson ad mar idea week last aunt dealt agreed little fliers equally whether without findings replaced material adopting education objection distribute
27:30
education cycling program materials distribute recommendation six deal much jury read safe civil grand agree public report easier bicycle tsunami pension advisory cyclists response replaced laughter committee
28:00
cyclists implemented billboard educating pamphlets correspondentce non dmv mta bike test plan mayor stores videos flyers already drivers include believe campaign provides changing response
28:30
bicycle plan saying provides implemented disagree another incorporate corporate distribution plant already agreement start amend advisory committee educational feasible amended material
29:00
educational awareness materials supervisor incorporate recommendation chu bac bike part bursa raise agree saying should versus perhaps program purpose advisory amending probably disagree response programs committee
29:30
training materials police california information chairperson 2b mar plan date peace goals center actions without finding include officer relevant question language objection standards objectives commission

Terms of Use (10 Mar 2001)